Sticks and Stones

Thinking back to my elementary school days, I remember how cruel children are to each other. Constant name calling and bickering which sometimes resulted in mild hazing, were commonplace. The instigators were usually referred to as "bullies."? These bullies had two basic kinds of assault, verbal, and physical. How were the victimized children taught to respond you ask? Physical assaults were commonly dealt with by the adults in one form or another. The verbal assaults were usually shrugged off and the children were told "Sticks and stones can break your bones, but words can never hurt you."? I remember this was usually the generic comeback to any insult, and was so widely used that it was extremely annoying.

There is however a message within that tired old saying that we have either forgotten, or failed to perpetuate to the rest of the world's population. That message is simple, ideas cannot hurt you. The vehicle of these ideas whether they be verbal, written, picture, or video are intangible and cannot hurt you unless you let them.

Now let me pose the question to the world. What the fuck happened? Instead of telling children to toughen up, parents will now sue the instigating party. There are cases of parents suing schools over 7 year old kids "sexually harassing"? each other. Something is definitely wrong here. If we keep treating kids like this they are going to be a hundred times worse than the current generation of parents with their kids. While on the subject of parents over-sheltering their kids this article is a prime example of how overly sensitive douchebags are going to censor and/or sue the rest of us to death if given the chance.

Muslims are another (more extreme) example of how out of touch people are with the concept of hurt feelings vs. ACTUALLY being hurt. All it takes to get them riled up to a riot-frenzy these days is a poorly sketched drawing of Mohamed. If this image hurt them, Allah save us all if they ever find goatse pictures (look it up on your own time, but take my word that its probably the grossest thing you can possibly see aside from mutilated corpses). (Note: Don't think I'm just ripping on Muslims here, Catholics get their undergarments ruffled whenever someone badmouths their precious Mary, and Christians in general get upset over almost everything.)

Pictures of naked people, depictions of sexual acts, rude language, simulated violence, or any groupings of words or pictures for that matter can do you no harm. If you choose not to be exposed to these things, good for you. Turn on your V-chip, home school your children, use the parental controls available for ANYTHING electronic these days, live in a sensory deprivation chamber for all I care, and leave those of us who choose to be exposed to whatever we want alone.

Basically what I'm getting at is that ideas don't cause pain, you cause yourself pain by being offended. You also choose what you are and are not offended by, and last time I checked you can choose what you expose yourself to for the most part. You can live in your censored, filtered, watered down, padded world, and we can still have our controversial, spicy world to indulge our need for the unfiltered flow of ideas.

Below I've created a handy reference guide for those that get easily offended, I hope it can help some of you out.

Offended by the TV?

Turn off the damned thing, or change the channel.

Offended by a newspaper drawing?

Don't subscribe to it.

Offended by internet porn?

Step away from the computer.

Sex and violence in video games getting you down?

Nobody forced you to play them.

This rant offends you?

You chose to read it.

I've just been offended by an image or grouping of words, what do I do now?

The human brain is an amazing thing. It has the capacity to forget things or cope with them. Keep in mind that not only does the brain control you, but you control it.

culture clash

I'd like to say that the most damage I've taken was from words, not necessarily actions. The relationship aspect is a big factor, however, the subject is... Any image of Mohammad is strictly against their religion. Which is, of course, an idea that they have a right to defend. I don't think that one culture should have a precedence than another. Also, considering I'm a visual artist and writer, I tend to like to say words and images have an extraordinary power, and at best can heal the world, or it can be used as a weapon. Sorry if this is sporadic, I'm at work with a raging hangover.
-sp5k
"Art is not decoration, embellishment; rather it is work of enlightenment. Art, in other words, is a technique for acquiring liberty."
Bruce Lee, Tao of Jeet Kune Do

.

Were those words that hurt you generalities or specific attacks at you and your character?

While words certainly can be powerful and change the world, a picture of some boobs or a prophet isn't going to destroy it. (Unless of course people facilitate the destruction.) And even though the image is against their religion, last time I checked so was killing people and/or destroying their property.

Mental memes?

Not that I disagree with the fact that people overreact to all sorts of tiny problems, but words CAN hurt you. I mean, you won't get a bleeding gash over your eyebrow if someone calls you a stinky poo-poo head, but words can potentially be even more damaging than any physical attack could.

You've got to look at the human mind not as some mystical source of intelligence, but as just a highly evolved, low energy super computer. While most species on the planet have very little chance for inter-computer information exchange, humanity has developed this wonderful thing called language.

Any computer connected to the world-wide-web for a split second can be exposed to millions of pieces of information that could drastically affect the software on that computer. Some of those pieces of information are even specially tailored to affect certain software applications, to exploit the system and gain control of the computer as a whole.

In psychology, these pieces of information are called memes and affect the human mind just as effectively as any virus can affect a computer. Simple examples of these memes could be the instant recogonition of corporate logos or national flags, and there are huge and elaborate mental viruses that spread daily and affect billions across the planet. One common classification of a large human mind virus is "religion"; cleverly crafted words that play on the emotional and reasoning systems of the human construct, and ultimately gain control of the system.

Not that all religion is bad; some people consider religion to be antivirus memes to protect the mind and body from corruption. (unprotected sex is bad, drugs are bad, killing is bad)

Just pointing out that words are just as effective as physical action, if not moreso.

agreed

Yeah you have a good point. It doesn't fully apply here however. Without getting into a nature vs. nurture debate I just want to re-emphasize my point that you can control your exposure to things (I was mainly focusing on the media and children at school.)

I think your point is more focusing on how one is raised. This can definitely have a huge impact and either strengthen or destroy a person. However it should be noted that 2 different people exposed to the same horrible things can have opposite reactions to it. For example the viral effect of religion as you describe. If your parents try to raise you a certain way you can choose to succumb to it, or strike out on your own with your own way of thinking.

People have a lot more choices than they realize, not only over their environments but also over themselves and their emotions.

I know you are but what am I?

You can't do or say anything without offending someone now a days. There is always going to be right and wrong but the majority of those are in the eye of the beholder. I say fuck 'em all!! I love the part where you said "I've just been offended by an image or grouping of words, what do I do now?" People are freaking retarded.

"The only constant in this world is changed" --George Carlin

...may break my bones, but the bruises hurt the most.

It could just be me, but I read earlier that people have the ability to choose how their influences impact them. Am I interpreting this right: that due to a person's ability to choose, they are more or less responsible for the damage they incur as a result of "words?"

I partially agree with that. A) because this goes beyond just words, and B) it has been proven that people can be mentally conditioned to completely ignore their own self and follow a set of preconfigured rules for how to live. This could also be known as slavery and/or death depending on your perspective.

Yet even though people are conditioned by their environment(peers, family, religious affiliation etc.) no one is born without the ability to form an opinion. And as much of a computer geek as I am, I really don't like relating human beings to computers for the simple fact that we have something called emotion. I learned this in Philosophy101: when people let emotion drive their actions - as previously mentioned - towards being offended at something no more dangerous (in the long run) than a burn, it is called _willed ignorance_.

I personally believe that if you choose to let things get to you, if you believe that it's OK to be offended at an idea that you believe is untrue, then you loose the right for me to give a damn. Because I see that as a fallacy, as a weakness, and most of all... just plain laziness.

"The problem with an open mind is, invariably, someone will try to put something in it..." - Terry Pratchett

-Dan

I agree with you 100%, that

I agree with you 100%, that is the point I was trying to make. :-)